Online casino sister sites in the UK: explained

Updated October 2026

Licensed

Available in GB

Fast payouts

18+ Only

A familiar layout does not prove common ownership: sister sites may share an operator or platform, while accounts and bonus terms remain distinct.

What “sister site” actually means

A casino sister site is not simply a website that looks familiar. The term describes a relationship behind the page: two casinos are connected because they belong to the same parent company or run on the same core technology.

That distinction matters. I have seen two casinos use almost identical game menus and payment buttons, then assumed they were part of one group. That was lazy checking. Similar software can be supplied to completely unrelated operators, so matching games alone do not prove that two brands are sister sites. Nor does a similar logo, colour scheme or welcome page.

The useful question is: who controls the casino, and who provides the machinery behind it?

Two different relationships

There are two main arrangements you may encounter when looking at casino sister sites in the UK.

Direct ownership

Under a direct-ownership model, the parent company creates and controls the casino brand. It decides how the website is designed, what it is called and how it is run. The casino operates under that company’s own UK Gambling Commission licence.

In practical terms, the same corporate group may launch several brands aimed at slightly different audiences. One could focus on slots, another on a particular style of presentation, while a third uses a different name to attract players who would not recognise the first brand. They can still be sister sites if the same parent company sits behind them.

That does not make the websites identical. A company can give each brand its own layout, tone and customer journey. The connection is about ownership and control, not whether every page has been copied.

This is the clearest meaning of “sister site” when people talk about UK online casino sister sites. The brands may be separate public-facing casinos, but the business relationship is direct.

White Label

A White Label arrangement works differently. Here, a software provider typically holds the gambling licence and manages the back-end mechanics. Another operator uses that established framework and can customise the public-facing brand, including its design and promotions.

Online slots not on GamStop: what to check

So the name on the front of the casino may belong to one operator, while the technology and regulatory structure come from a provider behind the scenes. Several branded casinos can therefore look related because they use the same platform, even when the relationship is not the same as several casinos being owned outright by one parent company.

This is where the wording can get slippery. People often call every casino using the same platform a sister site. I would not do that without checking the arrangement. Shared core technology is one recognised connection, but it does not automatically tell you that the brands have the same owner, the same commercial decisions or the same customer policies.

A software connection is not proof of common ownership.

What does not prove a sister-site relationship?

A shared game library is weak evidence. Game providers distribute their titles to many operators, so two unrelated casinos can offer much of the same selection. The same applies to familiar payment logos, standard registration screens and common-looking account menus.

Branding can mislead as well. A casino may deliberately borrow the visual style used across the market because players understand it quickly. That does not establish a corporate link. Even a very similar website may be built from a widely available template.

I made this mistake by treating the casino’s appearance as the evidence. The page felt familiar, so I assumed the companies were connected. Feeling familiar is not a company record.

How to check who is behind a casino

Start with the website footer. If you think two casinos might be operated by the same parent company, look for the ownership details printed there. The footer may identify the legal operator, company name or licensing information. Compare those details rather than relying on the brand name shown at the top of the page.

The terms and conditions can provide another useful clue, particularly the sections identifying the operator and the company responsible for the service. Read the legal wording carefully: a marketing brand and the legal entity running the gambling business are not always presented as the same thing.

For a UK player, the licence information is also important. In a direct-ownership setup, the parent company manages the casino under its own UKGC licence. In a White Label setup, the software provider typically holds the licence and runs the back-end, while the branded operator adjusts the public presentation and promotions.

That gives you a more reliable way to assess a possible relationship:

• compare the legal operator named in each site’s footer;
• check whether the licence information points to the same company;
• look for wording that identifies a White Label provider;
• treat matching games or design as clues only, not confirmation.

The phrase “online casino with no sister sites UK 2026” can therefore mean different things to different people. Some readers want a brand with no other casinos under the same parent company. Others want a site that does not share its platform with a wider group. Those are not necessarily the same requirement.

A casino may have no obvious sister brands while still using third-party technology. Another may belong to a large group but have a distinct design and separate public identity. Checking the operator details tells you which situation you are actually looking at.

That small bit of digging beats guessing from the homepage.

New brands are not the same as new casino platforms

When I see a casino described as “new”, I now stop before treating that as evidence of a new platform. The word can refer to the brand customers see, the operator behind it, or the technology running the site. Those are different things, and mixing them up is how a familiar casino network can look like a collection of fresh arrivals.

Non-GamStop Curacao Casinos: Checks for UK Players

A new brand may have a new name, colours and website design while relying on an established casino platform behind the scenes. The operator might already run other gambling brands, or the site may use a White Label arrangement in which another business provides the licensed infrastructure and back-end systems. Either way, a recently advertised name does not automatically mean that a new casino platform has entered the UK market.

That distinction matters if you are trying to find genuinely new online casino sites rather than another front door into an existing network. I have made that mistake myself: a different logo and a welcome page made a site feel unfamiliar, but the important machinery was not necessarily new. Fresh paint, not a new house.

What “recent” means here

A specialist review may describe a recent platform as a casino launched within the last 12 to 24 months. That is a useful working definition, but it still needs careful interpretation. The launch date might describe the public brand rather than the technology, licence arrangement or company operating it.

So there are several dates worth keeping separate:

• when the brand first became visible to customers;
• when the operator began running the casino;
• when the underlying platform was introduced;
• when the site received its current design or branding.

Only the third point clearly indicates a new casino platform. The others can describe a new presentation of an existing setup. This is why a list of “new casino sister sites” can contain brands that are new to the public but not new in the technical sense.

The same caution applies to the word “best”. A newly launched brand is not automatically a better one, and an older platform is not automatically a poor choice. Age alone tells you very little about how the site is operated or whether its current terms suit you. I would rather know what has actually changed than be nudged by a label that simply says “new”.

Why genuinely new platforms are uncommon

Building a real-money casino platform for the UK is not a light project. New operators face strict UKGC regulations, substantial licensing overheads and demanding compliance standards. Those requirements make a genuinely new platform more difficult and expensive to establish than a new brand layered over existing infrastructure.

Regulatory barrier

Building a real-money casino platform for the UK is difficult and expensive due to strict UKGC regulations, licensing overheads, and demanding compliance standards.

The regulatory side is not something a business can sensibly treat as decoration. A UK casino needs the appropriate Gambling Commission framework for serving British customers, and compliance affects how the operator runs the service. That makes the launch process more involved than publishing a new domain and uploading a selection of games.

The commercial pressure matters too. A business creating a platform must handle the technical systems, operating arrangements and compliance work together. The more established route can be to use infrastructure that is already available, then create a distinct customer-facing brand. That can produce a new name without producing a new platform.

This is why genuinely new casino platforms are increasingly rare in the UK. Strict regulation raises the entry barrier; licensing costs add another burden; and compliance standards leave little room for an improvised launch. New brands can still appear, but the appearance of a new brand should not be mistaken for evidence that the underlying platform was built from scratch.

How I would assess a “new” casino

I would start with the ownership and operator information shown on the site, rather than relying on the launch language in an advert. The footer can help identify who is behind the brand. Then I would look at whether the site presents itself as part of a wider group or uses a White Label arrangement.

Best Offshore Casino Sites: UK Rules Explained

The next step is comparing the practical structure without assuming that similar features prove anything on their own. A familiar interface, the same types of games or comparable payment options may point to shared technology, but they do not by themselves establish that two brands are sister sites or that one platform is newly built. Similarity is a clue, not proof.

I would also treat “new casino platform” and “new casino brand” as separate labels when reading reviews. A review describing a launch within the last 12 to 24 months may be talking about the brand’s arrival, not a newly developed platform. That wording is not necessarily wrong; it is simply less precise than it first appears.

There is another reason to avoid rushing into a new label. A brand can change while its operator, platform or wider business relationship remains familiar. Conversely, a familiar operator may introduce a new customer-facing site without creating a separate technical ecosystem. The name seen in an advert is only one piece of the picture.

Practical rule

If you want a new UK casino, first decide whether you mean a new brand or a genuinely new platform.

That leaves me with a fairly plain rule: if you want a new UK casino, first decide what “new” is meant to describe. A recent launch may be a new brand. A genuinely new platform is a much narrower claim, and the UK’s regulatory, licensing and compliance demands explain why it is not something to assume.

Recommended online casinos

1. Revery Play
   Bonus: 100% up to€1,000+ 100 FS · Payout speed: 1-3 business days
2. x3bet
   Bonus: Welcome Pack 100% Up to £1.000 + 200 Free Spins · Payout speed: 1-3 business days
3. Britsino
   Bonus: Welcome Package – Get your £2,200 + 2,000 FS · Payout speed: 1-3 business days
4. SlotoSport
   Bonus: 500% up to £ 10 200+ 777 FS · Payout speed: 1-3 business days
5. NightLuck
   Bonus: Welcome Pack + 805% Up To 6400€ + 280 FS · Payout speed: 1-3 business days
6. Amunbet
   Bonus: Join now and get 450% up to 2,700 GBP + 450 FS · Payout speed: 1-3 business days
7. EvoSpin
   Bonus: 125% up to €2500 + 125 Free Spins · Payout speed: 1-3 business days
8. BeOnBet
   Bonus: 100% up to €500 + 100 FS · Payout speed: 1-3 business days
9. Dieselwin
   Bonus: Welcome Pack 250% up to £4000 + 200 FS · Payout speed: 1-3 business days
10. Zombillion
    Bonus: Welcome Pack 250% up to £4000 + 200 FS · Payout speed: 1-3 business days

A sister-site bonus still comes with its own terms

A familiar casino network can make a new registration feel less unfamiliar. The games may look recognisable, the menus may work in much the same way, and a welcome offer may be available when you open an account with another brand. But that does not turn the promotion into a transferable network benefit.

A specialist affiliate review reports that registering with a sister site makes you eligible for that brand’s own sign-up offer, with familiar software often waiting on the other side of registration. That is useful as a description of how these networks can work, not as permission to assume that every brand offers the same deal. A promotion advertised as free spins at one casino could be replaced by a deposit bonus at another, or carry different qualifying conditions.

I made this mistake myself once: I saw a recognisable layout and assumed the welcome terms would follow it. They did not. Familiar screen, separate offer.

Read the offer for that brand

Before depositing, check the current promotion page and its full terms for the exact casino you intend to use. Look for:

• the required deposit method or qualifying deposit;
• which games count towards any wagering requirement;
• whether the bonus balance and winnings have separate conditions;
• the expiry period stated in the offer;
• any restrictions on existing customers or previous registrations within the operator’s network;
• withdrawal rules attached to bonus funds.

Do not rely on an older review, a cached page or the terms displayed at another sister site. Promotional wording changes, and the rules for one brand do not automatically become the rules for the next one. This matters particularly when you are comparing casino sister sites offering free spins, welcome bonuses or deposit incentives: the headline may sound similar while eligibility is different.

What may stay consistent

Networks often keep important wagering requirements and other core bonus conditions broadly aligned across their brands. That consistency can make the terms feel familiar, especially when the same software and game catalogue appear again. It still needs checking line by line. “Broadly aligned” is not the same as identical, and a similar interface is not evidence that the promotion is shared.

A specialist review also places a typical minimum withdrawal threshold at £10 and notes that promotional eligibility can differ between individual operator brands. Treat that figure as information tied to that type of review, not as a standing rule for every casino in the network. The live terms at the brand you choose take priority.

The same caution applies to multiple welcome offers. Opening accounts at several sister sites does not automatically mean you can claim every introductory promotion. Operators may limit eligibility by customer, household, payment method or previous participation, so check the current policy before registering again or making a deposit.

DO

• Check the current promotion page and its full terms for the specific casino.
• Verify the operator and company name in the website footer.

DON’T

• Rely on an older review or a cached page.
• Assume that a welcome offer is transferable between sister sites.

In practical terms, separate the familiar parts from the valuable parts. The software may feel the same. Some wagering language may be consistent. The bonus itself remains the responsibility of the individual brand, with its own current conditions. That is where the small print matters.

Trust starts with the operator, not the family resemblance

A casino can look familiar without earning your trust. The same colours, games or payment screens may appear across sister sites, but none of that tells you how carefully the operator handles identity checks, safer gambling duties or anti-money-laundering controls. I have made that mistake myself: I treated a recognisable network as a kind of guarantee. It is not.

For UK players, the operator behind the brand matters more than the family resemblance. A legal online casino serving Great Britain must operate under the relevant UK Gambling Commission framework, and the regulator’s requirements create a baseline that every site has to meet. That baseline is useful, but it is not the same thing as a spotless record.

One practical example is Know Your Customer verification. UK casinos must complete KYC checks before a player makes a first deposit, as part of anti-money-laundering requirements. In practice, that means the operator needs to establish who you are before allowing the gambling relationship to move forward. Identity details are not just a box-ticking exercise attached to a withdrawal request.

Still, KYC at registration does not prove that every other part of an operator’s compliance work is being handled perfectly. It tells you that a required control exists. It does not remove the need to look at the company’s wider regulatory history.

Online Casino No Registration UK: What It Means

The Entain case is a useful reminder. In a Gambling Commission notice dated 17 August 2022, the regulator said Entain would pay a £17 million settlement following failures involving social responsibility and anti-money-laundering controls. The figure was not attached to some unknown small brand at the edge of a network. £14 million of it related to LC International Limited, which operated 13 websites, including ladbrokes.com, coral.co.uk and foxybingo.com.

That detail matters when you are assessing casino sister sites in the UK. A large and familiar group can have substantial experience, recognisable brands and a broad customer base, yet still face serious regulatory action. Familiarity may make registration feel less uncertain. It cannot replace oversight.

I would therefore separate two questions. First: is the brand connected to an operator that is authorised to serve British customers? Second: how has that operator actually handled its responsibilities? The first is a basic entry requirement. The second gives you a more realistic picture of trust.

This is also why I would be wary of labels such as “safe” or “trusted” when they are used as decoration. Those words often describe the appearance of a network rather than a documented standard. A sister site may share technology, payment arrangements or branding with another casino, but its relationship to the parent company does not guarantee perfect compliance at every point.

The sensible approach is less exciting: treat the UKGC framework as a starting point, then consider the operator’s conduct rather than its reputation alone. Familiar name, separate question.

What a casino network can—and cannot—share

When I first looked into sister casinos in the UK, I made the lazy assumption that one company meant one large account behind every logo. That is not how the Foxy Bingo example works.

Entain Group

A broad family of brands including Gala Bingo, Coral, Ladbrokes, and Foxy Bingo.

LC International Limited

A company that operated 13 websites, including ladbrokes.com, coral.co.uk, and foxybingo.com.

A specialist affiliate review places Foxy Bingo within the wider Entain group, alongside Gala Bingo, Gala Spins, Gala Casino, Coral, Ladbrokes, bwin, PartyCasino, PartyPoker, Gamebookers and Sportingbet. That is a broad family: bingo, casino, poker, betting and other gaming brands appear under the same parent company. It shows how a casino network can stretch across different types of gambling site without turning them into identical products.

The useful point is the relationship, not the branding. Entain can operate these names as separate customer-facing businesses, each with its own presentation and account arrangements. Seeing Foxy Bingo and Gala Casino mentioned in the same group does not mean that every page, game lobby or promotion will look exactly the same. “Same family” is not the same as “same site”.

What may be shared

A network can have common corporate ownership behind several brands. That may also mean some operational foundations are related, such as technology, payment arrangements or internal procedures. From the outside, this can create a familiar feel when you move from one brand to another.

But familiarity is only a clue. It does not prove that your details, balance, limits, rewards or promotional eligibility move with you. I have treated a recognisable interface as evidence of a shared account before. It was not.

What stays brand-specific

Foxy Bingo and Gala Bingo each require their own account. The same applies when moving between Foxy Bingo and Ladbrokes: Ladbrokes requires a separate registration rather than allowing a Foxy account to serve both brands. Their terms also limit customers to one account for that particular brand.

Non-UK registered casinos: how regulation works

That distinction matters if you are comparing sister casinos or considering another brand in the same network. A separate account can mean a separate registration process, separate terms and a separate record of activity, even when the parent company is the same. Do not read “sister” as permission to open several accounts at one brand, either.

The practical rule is simple: use the individual brand’s registration page and terms as the authority. A company group can explain why several names sit together, but it does not combine their customer accounts by default. Same owner, separate doors.

A shared licence does not give you one shared account

A UK Gambling Commission account is easy to misread. I used to see several casino brands listed under one licence and assume they were effectively different front doors to the same account. That is not what the listing tells you. It identifies the legal licensee responsible for those gambling services; it does not create one universal customer account for every brand on the page.

So, if you open an account with one casino sister site, do not assume the same login will work elsewhere. A shared UKGC account is not a shared password. It also does not automatically mean that your balance, deposit history, withdrawal details or account limits will appear at another brand. Those are practical arrangements set by the operator and the individual site.

Attention A shared UKGC licence is not a universal customer account. You cannot assume that your login, balance, or deposit history will work across different brands.

The same applies to promotions. A licence shared by several brands does not turn one welcome offer into a network-wide offer. You cannot safely treat a bonus at one casino as available at every other brand under the same licence. Each promotion still belongs to the brand presenting it, with its own eligibility rules and current terms.

That distinction matters because the licence is a regulatory record, not a customer-access pass. It tells you who holds responsibility for the gambling activity. It does not tell you that the brands have merged their wallets, logins or marketing programmes. A similar footer, familiar games or matching account screens may point to a common structure, but none of those details proves that your account works across the whole group.

Self-exclusion is where guessing becomes genuinely risky. Whether excluding yourself from one brand also closes access to other brands under the same operator depends on that operator’s stated terms and account procedures. The licence alone does not answer the question. A shared licence should therefore never be treated as permission to try another brand after self-exclusion.

I would check the relevant self-exclusion wording before registering anywhere else, and contact the operator if the terms are unclear. Do not open a second account simply to test whether the systems recognise the earlier exclusion. That is a poor experiment with consequences for your account and your attempt to stay away.

There is a useful way to keep the issue straight:

• UKGC account: identifies the licensee.
• Brand account: sets the practical login and account relationship.
• Wallet and promotion: do not transfer merely because the licence is shared.
• Self-exclusion: follows the operator’s published terms, not the licence number alone.

Same licence, separate arrangements.

What can feel familiar when you register at another brand

The first thing I notice at casino sister sites for UK players is the shape of the place. The menus sit where I expect them, the cashier follows a familiar pattern, and the lobby can feel as though it was built from the same set of parts. That is not proof that the brands are identical. It simply reflects shared technology, design standards or operating infrastructure.

That familiarity has a practical use. If you have already spent time finding the games, opening the cashier and locating account settings at one brand, moving around another related casino may involve less guesswork. I have made the mistake of treating that comfort as evidence that every rule must match. It does not. Familiar screen, separate conditions.

Payment arrangements can also feel consistent across online casino sister sites for UK players. Sister brands may use common payment infrastructure, so a customer who already has experience with the network may recognise the available methods and the way deposits or withdrawals are presented. That can make moving between brands less awkward than starting from scratch with an unrelated operator.

Still, check the cashier at the individual casino. Shared infrastructure does not mean that every payment method, processing condition or transaction rule is guaranteed to be the same. Your balance does not move with you, and neither does a payment history simply because the websites look related. Treat each cashier as belonging to the brand where you opened it.

Verification

Verification may be quicker at a sister site if you already have a verified account within the same network, as relevant information may already be on file.

There may also be familiar loyalty features or promotional areas across a network. These can reflect common systems, but they should not be read as a promise that points, status, offers or eligibility transfer between accounts. I once assumed that a recognisable rewards panel meant I had already cleared the important details. I had not. The small print was still brand-specific.

Know Your Customer checks are another area where an existing relationship might help. A specialist review has reported that verification may be quicker at a sister site when the customer already has a verified account elsewhere in the same network, because relevant information may already be held on file. That is a possibility, not a shortcut around KYC. The new brand can still ask you to confirm your identity, address or date of birth before it allows deposits and play.

So the useful expectation is modest: similar navigation, potentially familiar payment handling and possibly less repeated verification work. The account itself remains tied to the casino where you registered. Separate login. Separate balance. Separate decision.

Bingo and casino brands can sit in the same family

A gambling network does not have to stay inside one category. The same parent company can run bingo rooms, online casinos, slots brands and betting websites, each with its own name and presentation. That is why a search for casino and bingo sister sites in the UK can produce a mixture of brands rather than a neat row of casino-only operators.

Foxy Bingo is a useful example. A specialist review identifies Gala Bingo, Gala Spins and Gala Casino alongside Coral, Ladbrokes, bwin, PartyCasino, PartyPoker, Gamebookers and Sportingbet as brands run by Entain. The list crosses several parts of gambling: bingo, casino, poker and sports betting. Seeing those names together does not mean that every page, promotion or account facility works in the same way. It shows the family connection.

I made the mistake of treating a familiar logo and a familiar cashier as proof that everything was shared. That is too quick. Foxy Bingo and Gala Bingo may sit within the same wider group, but the terms for each brand still matter. The same applies when moving from a bingo brand to a casino or betting brand: the relationship can be real without turning the services into one combined account.

Casino Without a UK Licence: What It Means

The account rule is the practical bit. Gala Bingo requires its own account rather than letting you use a Foxy account, and its terms allow one account per brand. Ladbrokes follows the same separate-account approach. So, even where the operator family is known, you should expect registration and brand-specific account rules rather than assuming that an existing login, balance or offer will follow you.

That also stops the net from being cast too widely. A bingo name appearing in a discussion about sister sites is not enough to place it in the Foxy family. A players’ forum records Cheeky Bingo as inactive on UKGC account 54743. The same account does not list Buzz Bingo, Heart Bingo or Lucky Pants Bingo, and those brands do not share Foxy’s licence. They should not be presented as Foxy sister sites simply because they operate in the same broad bingo market.

The clean way to check a claimed relationship is to match the brand with the operator information and then read that brand’s account terms. Parent-company connections can explain why casino and bingo sites feel related; they do not erase the boundary between them. Same family, separate doors.

Malta MGA Licence for Online Casinos in the UK

Casino brands and bookmakers under one operator

A casino family can extend beyond casino-only names. The same operator may run a sportsbook, a bingo service and several casino brands, each aimed at a slightly different audience. That makes the relationship useful to understand, but it does not turn the websites into one combined account system.

The documented Entain example is broad. Foxy Bingo’s sister brands have been identified as Gala Bingo, Gala Spins, Gala Casino, Coral, Ladbrokes, bwin, PartyCasino, PartyPoker, Gamebookers and Sportingbet. That list includes bingo, casino, poker and betting names. In practical terms, a player moving from Foxy Bingo to Ladbrokes is moving between brands in the same wider corporate family, not necessarily between two identical casino sites.

A specialist review describing the network also linked Foxy Bingo with these Entain-operated brands. Treat that as a pointer to the corporate relationship, not as proof that every current feature is shared. Brand ownership and the customer experience are separate questions.

LC International provides another useful illustration. A Gambling Commission settlement involving Entain included £14 million attributed to LC International Limited. The company operated 13 websites, among them ladbrokes.com, coral.co.uk and foxybingo.com. So a bookmaker’s name can appear alongside casino and bingo domains under one operating structure.

UK mobile casinos that accept phone-credit payments

That still does not establish that your Ladbrokes balance can be used at Coral, or that a Foxy Bingo promotion is available at PartyCasino. A shared operator may support several distinct brands, while each website presents its own registration process, account rules and promotional conditions. Familiar branding can make the connection look simpler than it is.

I made that mistake myself: I saw the same corporate family and assumed the practical details would follow me. They did not. Check the individual brand’s current terms before registering, depositing or treating a bookmaker and casino account as interchangeable. Same owner. Separate decisions.

Check the licence—and understand where exclusion applies

When I check licensed casino sister sites in the UK, I start with the operator rather than the logo on the homepage. The UK Gambling Commission’s public account record shows which legal entity is connected to the domains and whether each entry is active.

The status matters. An active domain is listed as operating under that account at the time of checking. An inactive entry is not the same thing as a current casino, even if the brand name still appears in older reviews or forum posts. White Label entries are shown separately, so they should not be quietly treated as direct brands of the account holder.

A specialist review of the Commission’s register recorded account 54743 for LC International Limited on 24 September 2026. The record contained 15 domain rows: 13 were marked Active, two Inactive, and none White Label. That is useful evidence of the account’s recorded structure on that date, not a permanent guarantee about what will be listed later.

I would also check the date every time. Licence records change, and an old page can make a closed or transferred brand look current. Small detail, big difference.

Licence checking is not a workaround for self-exclusion. GAMSTOP covers every online gambling operator holding a licence for Great Britain, so moving from one brand to another does not provide a route around a GAMSTOP block. The exclusion choices are six months, one year or five years. Once the selected period ends, the exclusion remains until removal is requested, and that continuation can last for no more than a further seven years.

Casino sites not registered with GamStop: UK guide

A separate brand account or a different name does not cancel that protection. Nor should “sister site” be read as permission to register elsewhere after excluding yourself. If you have self-excluded, treat the exclusion as applying across the licensed online market covered by GAMSTOP, not just to the site where you first made the request.

Responsible Gambling